Dallas Stars VIII

[Gast]

Wenn ich zwischen Modano oder Guerin entscheiden müsste,hätte ich aber Modano gewählt.
Das wundert mich jetzt doch ein bißchen die Entscheidung.
Wo steht das denn im Netz wegen Guerin?

[Walzy]

naja es gibt in der Liga noch eine andere, die mehr als die 6,6 oder 6,7 wie Guerin kriegen....

aber das bestätigt in meinen augen eigentlich nur, dass Modano weg is

[martinf112]

Giguere schrieb am 30.07.2005 10:21
Die Stars werden Guerin mit seinem Mördergahlt behalten und ihn nicht aus seinem vertrag auskaufen!
Mal abwarten,ob es nicht klüger gewesen wäre für diese geld einen anderen Spieler zu holen.

Überraschend! Hätte ich nicht gedacht, weil er doch meiner Meinung nach nicht so viel Geld wert ist.

[Gast]

Die Stars werden Guerin mit seinem Mördergahlt behalten und ihn nicht aus seinem vertrag auskaufen!
Mal abwarten,ob es nicht klüger gewesen wäre für diese geld einen anderen Spieler zu holen.

[Walzy]

Dallas hat nun auch angefangen QOs azu verteilen, die ersten 4 sind Arnott, Kapanen, Erskine und Jancevski

[Walzy]

With a deadline looming, the Dallas Stars Thursday signed 2003 draft picks Shawn Belle and forward B.J Crombeen to three-year entry-level contracts.

   

geil dass man es doch noch geschafft hat, v.a. bei Belle  
ich geh auch fest davon aus, dass beide ordentlich NHL luft schnupper werden      

[Walzy]

TEIL II

Defense

Trevor Daley
Pros: Can control a game with his skating ability, dangerous with or without the puck in the offensive zone, can lead the rush, underrated strength
Cons: Small for a defenseman, defensive zone coverage is more adequate than anything, shot inconsistent
Performance: Met expectations

Johan Fransson
Pros: Can control a game with his skating ability, can lead the rush, very patient with the puck, makes outstanding offensive decisions, strong shot with quick release, projectable frame, underrated strength along the boards
Cons: Needs bulk, defensive zone coverage needs improvement, gap control needs improvement
Performance: Slightly above expectations

Jarad Bourassa
Not enough information

Elias Granath
Pros: Sound defender in the defensive zone, solid performer in the offensive zone, projectable frame
Cons: Mobility needs to improve for him to go to the next level
Performance: Slightly below expectations

Niklas Grossman
Pros: Tremendous reach and strength, hard to beat one-on-one, physically punishing without taking himself out of the play, rarely out of position, leadership potential, not without offensive capability
Cons: Needs to fill out his frame, positioning and reach mask his below average mobility, doubtful that he’ll produce a lot at the NHL level
Performance: Above expectations

Mark Fistric
Pros: Tremendous strength, hard to beat one-on-one, physically punishing without taking himself out of the play, rarely out of position, leadership potential, great first pass, respectable smarts at the point, physical speciman
Cons: Needs playing time, could improve his mobility, doubtful that he’ll produce a lot at the NHL level
Performance: Met expectations

Andrew Canzanello
Pros: Smart player in all zones, stronger than he looks, can dish out some big hits
Cons: Not much of a chance at a NHL future (could be useful in Iowa though)
Performance: Above expectations

Matt Nickerson
Pros: Absolutely huge, takes the initiative on offense, physically dominating, good hands for a player his size
Cons: Needs maturity in his game, skating is no more than average
Performance: Met expectations

Shawn Belle
Pros: Fantastic skater, very strong, smart defensive player, strong first pass, good at the point
Cons: Questionable offensive awareness (especially on the rush), needs some seasoning
Performance: Met expectations

Lukas Vomela
Pros: Good shot from the point, good hockey sense, solid defensive play
Cons: Needs bulk to better control physical players, needs more seasoning
Performance: Above expectations


Goaltenders

Dan Ellis
Pros: Strong mobility, excellent glove, doesn’t give up on the play, good puck handler, good reflex goalie
Cons: Inconsistent performance, rebound control spotty, rather old
Performance: Met expectations

Mike Smith
Pros: Covers a lot of the net, excellent puck handler, good reflex goalie
Cons: Weak five hole, rebound control spotty, injury risk a concern (he pulled a muscle in the camp)
Performance: Incomplete

Tobias Stephan
Pros: Excellent reflexes and glove hand, strong movement
Cons: Needs time to adjust to NA angles, inconsistent performer, puck handling is poor, technique could improve
Performance: Met expectations

thx @GLU

[Walzy]

naja die sollen auch erstmal nur in Iowa zum einsatz kommen.
mein Kollege in sachen Stars-artikel hatte die gelegenheit auch beim prospect camp der Stars vorbeizuschauen und hat die spieler beurteilt. ich poste das nun auch mal hier (natürlich nach rücksprache mit ihm ;D ):


TEIL I

Forwards

Junior Lessard
Pros: Extremely solid on his skates, goes into traffic areas, always keeps after the puck in the offensive zone until the play is dead, good shot
Cons: May not have the skill level to be an impact player in the NHL, skating could improve a little more
Performance: Met expectations

Loui Eriksson
Pros: Smooth skater, looks to have a high skill level, projectable frame
Cons: Didn’t look like he put a lot into the camp
Performance: Below expectations

Marius Holtet
Pros: Fantastic shot, aggressive player on both ends, will play physical, good skill level
Cons: Body may not hold up to his style of play, consistency worrisome
Performance: Met expectations

Vojtech Polak
Pros: Tremendous hands, outstanding skill level, fantastic selection of shots, great puck handler, offensive awareness is excellent, explosive skater
Cons: Defense is nearly non-existent, cherry picks, needs bulk, prefers to avoid contact
Performance: Above expectations

Tuomas Mikkonen
Not enough information

Gino Guyer
Pros: Excellent skater, heads-up player with a lot of hustle, good hockey sense on both ends, good skill level
Cons: A tad small at this point, concerned that he’ll bring his game up the level needed to be a NHL player
Performance: Above expectations

Jarkko A. Immonen
Pros: Very smart player, great positionally, adequate offensively
Cons: Doesn’t stand out much, Needs to play against higher-level players
Performance: Slightly below expectations

Yared Hagos
Pros: Very strong, good hockey sense, lots of hustle in both ends, deceptive moves, controls the puck with strength and skill, great playmaker, very strong on the boards
Cons: May need to improve skating more to be effective in the NHL, needs work on faceoffs, shot could be improved a little more
Performance: Above expectations

David Bararuk
Pros: Very good skill level, has a knack for putting up points, offensive awareness is a key attribute
Cons: Needs to prove himself against better competition
Performance: Met expectations

Jimmie Johnson
Not enough information

John Lammers
Pros: Good skill level, soft hands, versatile shot selection, deceptive speed
Cons: Production doesn’t match with displayed skill level, consistency a worry
Performance: Slightly below expectations

B. J. Crombeen
Pros: NHL-caliber shot, lots of hustle, plays a sound physical game, sound defensively
Cons: Lateral mobility still a concern, skill level adequate but not outsanding
Performance: Met expectations

Francis Wathier
Pros: Gives 110% every shift, takes coaching well, strong along the boards
Cons: Questionable skill level and skating, still very raw, physically underdeveloped
Performance: Below expectations

Frederik Naslund
Pros: Soft hands, huge frame, looks to have great upside, adequate speed
Cons: Needs to adjust to his body, very awkward looking, likely weakens his agility and production
Performance: Slightly below expectations

Ned Havern
Pros: Great shot, heart and soul type player, not out of place in an offensive role, good hockey sense
Cons: Probably could use some time in minors to find a role in the pros, comes from a very deep team so it’s hard to gauge his actual value
Performance: Above expectations

Rob Hisey
Pros: Undeniably skilled, tremendous moves, soft hands, good shooter and passer, good speed (but average for a player of his style)
Cons: Didn’t stand out as much as expected, dangles too much, needs to improve skating or decision making to make an impact in the pro ranks
Performance: Below expectations

Janos Vas
Pros: Strong on his skates, good offensive instincts, digs in around the net, good skill level, good shot accuracy
Cons: Disappointed by his puck handling, not sure his defensive play is good enough yet
Performance: Slightly above average

Ray Sawada
Pros: Smart player, positionally sound in all zones, projectable frame, strong along the boards, good playmaker, aggressive forechecker, noticeable physical game
Cons: Not sure he has the tools to produce effectively at higher levels, may not be more than a forechecker
Performance: Met expectations

Joel Lundqvist
Pros: Strong physical player, can control play along the boards, strong defensive presence, good puck handler
Cons: Terrible skating will limit his effectiveness
Performance: Slightly below expectations

big thanks @ GLU  ;D

[Gast]

Francis Wathier hat bei seinen bisherigen Stationen keineswegs überzeugt,bei Janos Vas muss man abwarten.
Insgesamt jedoch 2 Leute die ,die Stars net wirklich verstärken und wo ich die Verpflichtungen nicht ganz nachvollziehen kann.

[Walzy]

hm...nun hat nach Janos Vas auch Francis Wathier einen 3-jahresvertrag bekommen. Kann ich aber in keinster Weise nachvollziehen.

über Wathier gabs in den letzten jahren für Fans fast nie was gutes zu hören, also hatte man schon beim diesjährigen prospect-camp kaum erwartungen an ihn....aber selbst diese hat er nicht erfüllen können  

der kann also wirklich nur positiv überraschen

[Walzy]

geilop, Janos Vas hat von den Stars nen two-way vertrag über 3 jahre bekommen      

nachdem er die letzten 3 jahre immer mit großen verletzungen kämpfen musste, hätte ich nicht gedacht, dass sie ihn noch rüberholen.

Vas war der #32 OA pick 2002

[Gast]

Turco schrieb am 27.07.2005 14:04
ähm.....soo defensiv hat hat Tippett aber nich spielen lassen.

es lag wohl eher daran, dass turgeon in seiner ersten season nicht sonderlich überzeugte (auch weil er immer wieder kleinere verletzungen hatte) und dann letzte season nicht mehr über die 3. Reihe hinauskam und das teilweise auch nur noch als LW.

Ich glaube auch eher das was Marvel meinte das Turgeon wohl alles andere als schlecht ist sondern nie in das System der Stars passte, ueberall wo er davor spielte (STL,NYI,MTL,BUF) war er einer wenn nicht sogar der fuehrenden Scorer. Hoffentlich findet Pierre einen neuen Arbeitgeber wo er hinpasst und seine grossartige Karriere wuerdig beendet.

[Walzy]

ähm.....soo defensiv hat hat Tippett aber nich spielen lassen.

es lag wohl eher daran, dass turgeon in seiner ersten season nicht sonderlich überzeugte (auch weil er immer wieder kleinere verletzungen hatte) und dann letzte season nicht mehr über die 3. Reihe hinauskam und das teilweise auch nur noch als LW.

[Marvel]

Turgeon ist alles andere als schlecht. Er passte nur nie in das System der Stars. Zu defensiv ausgerichtet, Turgeon muss offensiv spielen...

[Walzy]

13 Datsyuk schrieb am 27.07.2005 21:52
Dallas waive Pierre Turgeon.Finde jetzt nicht das es so tragisch ist.

aus meiner sicht wäre es eher tragisch, wenn man das nicht tun würde